Physics Question 38 – JEE-MAIN 2026
🧠 Full Solution Path
Assertion A states that in electrostatics, a conductor does not store any net charge inside. This is a fundamental property of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium. The electric field inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is zero. By Gauss's law, if the electric field is zero everywhere inside a closed surface within the conductor, the net charge enclosed by that surface must be zero. Any excess charge on a conductor resides entirely on its outer surface. Therefore, Assertion A is TRUE.
Reason R states that inside a capacitor (with no dielectric medium), the free charge carriers, if placed between the plates of capacitor, experience force and drift. Between the plates of a charged capacitor, there exists a uniform electric field
Both Assertion A and Reason R are true statements. However, Reason R describes the behavior of charges in an electric field within a capacitor, while Assertion A describes the distribution of charge within a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium. Reason R does not explain *why* a conductor has no net charge inside. The explanation for Assertion A lies in the fact that the electric field inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is zero, which forces all excess charge to the surface. Reason R is a consequence of charges experiencing force in an electric field, which is a different concept. Thus, Reason R is NOT the correct explanation for Assertion A.
Distinguish between the properties of conductors in equilibrium and the general behavior of charges in an electric field.
